Could it be that Calvinists are losing the debate in the blogosphere?

It's actually quite simple.  If you like your Scripture straight up, if you hold to inerrancy, you'll never have a big problem with Calvinism.

BUT, if you have a feminist perspective, as WartburgWatch clearly does; you'll hate Calvinism because IT is not going to support feminism.

Actually, if you are of a feminist persuasive, you are also going to have problems with conservative Arminianism.  That's why T.W.W. doesn't like the Southern Baptist; be they Calvinistic or Arminian in their approach.

If you're a feminist, you'll hate INERRANCY from either school of thought.

Here's what Scripture informs:

Rom 11;3-5
The Remnant of Israel
…3“Lord, they have killed Your prophets and torn down Your altars. I am the only one left, and they are seeking my life as well”? 4And what was thedivine reply to him? “I have reserved for Myselfseven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” 5In the same way, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace.…

AND THE POINT IS:  It will always be a small group of individuals who have not bowed the knee to the current societal flow of FEMINISM.

It is IMMENSELY unpopular even in most Evangelical churches to suggest that God ordained different roles and positions for men and women.

So there you have it;  Calvinists are not winning the debate, they have NEVER been winning the debate.  They just continue to hold to the inerrancy of Scripture - hugely unpopular in our secular/feminist times.

[  God has always had his watchmen; He will ALWAYS have His watchmen.  More often then not; their stance against the liberal world view will make them outcasts at places like T.W.W who support the broad highway of Christianity lite. ]